Reach the important pages
Investigate broken paths, server responses and access restrictions that may affect discovery or crawling.
Help search engines access and understand your important pages. I investigate technical barriers, prioritize the work and implement agreed fixes so your website can better support your content and customer journey.
Crawling · Indexing · Site structure · Performance · Verification
Illustrative review areas · Actual findings follow the audit.
A useful service page still needs to be accessible, linked and represented correctly. Technical SEO examines how the website delivers its pages and whether its settings support the pages you want people to find.
Investigate broken paths, server responses and access restrictions that may affect discovery or crawling.
Review redirects, indexing directives and preferred URLs against the purpose of each page.
Identify practical performance and mobile issues that affect how visitors use the site.
The review can focus on a specific issue, a WordPress website or a broader technical audit. We agree on coverage and implementation responsibilities before changes begin.
Review robots.txt, relevant access restrictions, response codes and available crawl data. Investigate recurring server errors and important pages that cannot be reached reliably.
Review noindex directives, canonical tags, duplicate URL patterns and available Search Console findings. Align the intended page signals with the site’s content and URL strategy.
Check how visitors and crawlers reach priority pages. Review broken internal links, orphaned pages where identifiable and whether sitemaps reflect intended URLs.
Review available Core Web Vitals field data alongside diagnostic tests. Identify practical improvements to images, scripts, caching and layout while checking important interactions.
Check whether important text and links appear in rendered pages. Review relevant structured data for validity and consistency with visible content.
Plan URL mappings for agreed moves or consolidations. Review redirect destinations, internal links and launch checks when changing a site structure, domain or platform.
An audit should explain the problem, the affected pages and the proposed action. I group findings by likely impact, implementation effort and dependencies so the next steps are clear.
Some changes belong in WordPress. Others may need your hosting provider or developer. The roadmap identifies who needs to act.
WordPress settings, theme templates, plugins and hosting can all affect page delivery. I investigate the cause before changing settings and check the important pages and interactions after the agreed work.
Explore the case studies →We define the review scope and the important pages first, then turn the findings into an agreed sequence of work.
Review the site, priority pages and available Search Console or server data.
Document the findings, proposed fixes and implementation dependencies.
Apply scoped fixes with suitable backups and staging where available.
Verify affected pages and interactions, then review available search signals over time.
The scope can include a focused diagnosis, a documented audit or implementation and verification. We agree on the deliverables and identify any work that needs your developer or hosting provider.
There can be several causes, including access problems, indexing directives, duplicate-page signals or content considerations. We investigate the specific URL and available Search Console evidence. Meeting the technical requirements does not guarantee indexing.
No. Technical work supports access, page understanding and usability, while search performance also depends on content, relevance and competition. We separate completed fixes from their observed search impact.
The priority is a usable website and meaningful improvements for visitors. Diagnostic scores and real-user Core Web Vitals data answer different questions. A perfect test score does not guarantee rankings, and performance changes should preserve important site functions.
No. A removed page without a suitable replacement may correctly return a not-found response. Where a relevant replacement exists, a redirect may be appropriate. We review the page’s purpose and incoming links before deciding.
Yes. The work can include a URL inventory, agreed redirect mapping and checks before and after launch. Migration scope depends on the platform, size of the site and changes planned. Search visibility can fluctuate during a move.
A review may need Search Console access and a crawl of public pages. Implementation may require WordPress, hosting or staging access, depending on the issue. We agree on the access needed and you retain ownership of your accounts.
Tell me what is happening on your website and which pages matter to your business. Let’s identify the next useful improvements.
Discuss your technical SEO →